2000 Ford Artic vs. 1978 Mazda 818
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Artic (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Artic should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 818. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Artic weights approximately 298 kg more than 1978 Mazda 818. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 818. (92 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Artic | 1978 Mazda 818 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Artic | 818 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 92 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2320 mm |