2000 Ford Artic vs. 1983 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 182 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Artic | 1983 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Artic | Cougar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2650 mm |