2000 Ford Artic vs. 1986 Acura Integra
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Acura Integra would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Artic (128 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1986 Acura Integra. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Artic should accelerate faster than 1986 Acura Integra.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 1986 Acura Integra has manual transmission. 1986 Acura Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Artic | 1986 Acura Integra | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Artic | Integra |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 113 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4285 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2450 mm |