2000 Ford Artic vs. 1988 Renault Megane
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Renault Megane would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Renault Megane (250 HP) has 122 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Renault Megane. (181 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Renault Megane. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 1988 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 1988 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Artic | 1988 Renault Megane | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Artic | Megane |
Year Released | 2000 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 181 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |