2000 Ford Artic vs. 1992 Buick Century
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Buick Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Buick Century would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Artic (128 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1992 Buick Century. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Artic should accelerate faster than 1992 Buick Century.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Buick Century. (183 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Buick Century.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Artic | 1992 Buick Century | |
| Make | Ford | Buick |
| Model | Artic | Century |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3998 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 109 HP |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4803 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1364 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2662 mm |
