2000 Ford Artic vs. 1995 Honda Accord

To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Honda Accord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Honda Accord would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Honda Accord (131 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Honda Accord weights approximately 10 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Honda Accord. (178 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Honda Accord. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 1995 Honda Accord has manual transmission. 1995 Honda Accord will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: