2000 Ford Artic vs. 1995 Plymouth Voyager

To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Artic (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1995 Plymouth Voyager. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Artic should accelerate faster than 1995 Plymouth Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Plymouth Voyager weights approximately 107 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic.

Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Plymouth Voyager. (183 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Plymouth Voyager.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Artic 1995 Plymouth Voyager
Make Ford Plymouth
Model Artic Voyager
Year Released 2000 1995
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3998 cc 2501 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 128 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 325 Nm 183 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Vehicle Weight 1298 kg 1405 kg
Vehicle Length 5240 mm 4470 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1790 mm 1650 mm
Wheelbase Size 3200 mm 2860 mm