2000 Ford Artic vs. 1996 Acura SLX
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura SLX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura SLX would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura SLX (190 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura SLX should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Acura SLX weights approximately 277 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura SLX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Artic | 1996 Acura SLX | |
| Make | Ford | Acura |
| Model | Artic | SLX |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3998 cc | 3494 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 190 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4661 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1834 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2761 mm |
