2000 Ford Artic vs. 1996 Mazda MPV

To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Artic (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1996 Mazda MPV. (114 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Artic should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda MPV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda MPV weights approximately 492 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda MPV. (277 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda MPV. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 1996 Mazda MPV has manual transmission. 1996 Mazda MPV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: