2000 Ford Artic vs. 1998 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Artic | 1998 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Artic | Taurus |
Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 2964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2760 mm |