2000 Ford Artic vs. 1998 Proton Satria
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Proton Satria. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Proton Satria would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Proton Satria, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Proton Satria. (161 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Proton Satria. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 1998 Proton Satria has manual transmission. 1998 Proton Satria will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Artic | 1998 Proton Satria | |
| Make | Ford | Proton |
| Model | Artic | Satria |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3998 cc | 1833 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 161 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2450 mm |
