2000 Ford Artic vs. 2002 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2002 Westfield ZEI is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Westfield ZEI (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Westfield ZEI should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Artic weights approximately 626 kg more than 2002 Westfield ZEI.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 2002 Westfield ZEI has manual transmission. 2002 Westfield ZEI will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Artic | 2002 Westfield ZEI | |
| Make | Ford | Westfield |
| Model | Artic | ZEI |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 3998 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 672 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 3550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2340 mm |
