2000 Ford Artic vs. 2003 TVR T 350
To start off, 2003 TVR T 350 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 TVR T 350 (346 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 TVR T 350 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Artic weights approximately 194 kg more than 2003 TVR T 350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 TVR T 350 (393 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Artic. (325 Nm). This means 2003 TVR T 350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Artic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Artic | 2003 TVR T 350 | |
Make | Ford | TVR |
Model | Artic | T 350 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 3605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 346 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 393 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 57 L |