2000 Ford Artic vs. 2005 Ford E-250
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1006 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Artic. (325 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Artic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Artic | 2005 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Artic | E-250 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 388 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 2304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 132 L |