2000 Ford Artic vs. 2007 Lincoln MKZ
To start off, 2007 Lincoln MKZ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Lincoln MKZ (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Lincoln MKZ should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic.
Because 2007 Lincoln MKZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Artic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Lincoln MKZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Lincoln MKZ (338 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Artic. (325 Nm). This means 2007 Lincoln MKZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Artic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Artic | 2007 Lincoln MKZ | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | Artic | MKZ |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3998 cc | 3494 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 263 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 76 L |
