2000 Ford Artic vs. 2008 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2008 Isuzu KB is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Isuzu KB weights approximately 162 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu KB. (190 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu KB. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 2008 Isuzu KB has manual transmission. 2008 Isuzu KB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Artic | 2008 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | Ford | Isuzu |
| Model | Artic | KB |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3998 cc | 2197 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1460 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 75 L |
