2000 Ford Artic vs. 2008 Opel Astra
To start off, 2008 Opel Astra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Opel Astra weights approximately 12 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Opel Astra. (170 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Opel Astra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Artic | 2008 Opel Astra | |
| Make | Ford | Opel |
| Model | Artic | Astra |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3998 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 52 L |
