2000 Ford Artic vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Artic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (350 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Artic. (325 Nm). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Artic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Artic | 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Artic | ML |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3998 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 95 L |
