2000 Ford Artic vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 150 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Artic. (325 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Artic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Artic | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Artic | Calais |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3998 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
