2000 Ford Artic vs. 2010 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2010 Toyota Camry is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Camry (187 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Camry weights approximately 371 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Artic | 2010 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Artic | Camry |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1669 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4806 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |