2000 Ford Artic vs. 2011 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2011 Ford Explorer is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Explorer (290 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Explorer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Explorer (345 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Artic. (325 Nm). This means 2011 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Artic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Artic | 2011 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Artic | Explorer |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 345 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 5006 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2004 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1788 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 70 L |