2000 Ford Artic vs. 2011 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2011 Holden Colorado is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Artic. (325 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Artic. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 2011 Holden Colorado has manual transmission. 2011 Holden Colorado will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Artic | 2011 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Artic | Colorado |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |