2000 Ford Artic vs. 2011 Hyundai Elantra
To start off, 2011 Hyundai Elantra is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Hyundai Elantra (145 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Hyundai Elantra should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Hyundai Elantra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Hyundai Elantra. (176 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Hyundai Elantra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Artic | 2011 Hyundai Elantra | |
| Make | Ford | Hyundai |
| Model | Artic | Elantra |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3998 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4529 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1775 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 48 L |
