2000 Ford Artic vs. 2011 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2011 Nissan Frontier is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Frontier (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic.
Because 2011 Nissan Frontier is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Artic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Frontier will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Frontier (381 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Artic. (325 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Artic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Artic | 2011 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Artic | Frontier |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 3953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 381 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 80 L |