2000 Ford Artic vs. 2012 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2012 Renault Fluence is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Fluence (140 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Artic weights approximately 73 kg more than 2012 Renault Fluence.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Artic | 2012 Renault Fluence | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Artic | Fluence |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3998 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 140 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4618 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1809 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2702 mm |
