2000 Ford Contour vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Ford Contour is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,544 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Contour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Contour (201 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Contour should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Contour weights approximately 333 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Contour (230 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Contour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Contour | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Contour | Cedric |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2544 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1418 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2540 mm |