2000 Ford Contour vs. 1980 Mazda 929
To start off, 2000 Ford Contour is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,544 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Contour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Contour (201 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Contour should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Contour weights approximately 348 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Contour (230 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Contour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Contour | 1980 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Contour | 929 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2544 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.4 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 88 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1418 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |