2000 Ford Contour vs. 2001 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2001 Toyota Celica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Contour. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Contour would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Contour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Celica (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2000 Ford Contour. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Contour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Contour weights approximately 129 kg more than 2001 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 180 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Contour | 2001 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Contour | Celica |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.8 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 85.1 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1248 kg | 1119 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2510 mm |