2000 Ford Contour vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Contour. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Contour would be higher. At 2,544 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Contour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2000 Ford Contour. (201 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Contour.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Contour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Contour (230 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Contour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Contour | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Contour | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2544 cc | 1306 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 64 L |