2000 Ford Cougar vs. 1987 Opel Omega
To start off, 2000 Ford Cougar is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Opel Omega would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Cougar (129 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1987 Opel Omega. (110 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 1987 Opel Omega.
Because 1987 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Cougar (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Opel Omega. (160 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Cougar | 1987 Opel Omega | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Cougar | Omega |
Year Released | 2000 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2740 mm |