2000 Ford Cougar vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Cougar would be higher. At 1,988 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Cougar (129 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Cougar weights approximately 375 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Cougar (176 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Cougar | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Cougar | 6 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.9 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.9 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2610 mm |