2000 Ford Desert Excursion vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Desert Excursion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Desert Excursion would be higher. At 6,800 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Ford Desert Excursion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Desert Excursion (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-09. (269 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Desert Excursion should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-09. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-09 weights approximately 764 kg more than 2000 Ford Desert Excursion.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Desert Excursion (576 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-09. (366 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Desert Excursion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-09.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Desert Excursion | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Desert Excursion | CX-09 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6800 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 576 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 2062 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2875 mm |
