2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1956 Saab 92B
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Saab 92B would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 423 kg more than 1956 Saab 92B.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 1956 Saab 92B has manual transmission. 1956 Saab 92B will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 1956 Saab 92B | |
| Make | Ford | Saab |
| Model | e-Ka | 92B |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 763 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 785 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2480 mm |
