2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1960 Renault Juva
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 428 kg more than 1960 Renault Juva.
Because 1960 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 1960 Renault Juva has manual transmission. 1960 Renault Juva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford e-Ka | 1960 Renault Juva | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | e-Ka | Juva |
Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 780 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2360 mm |