2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1962 Honda S500

To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Honda S500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Honda S500 would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1962 Honda S500. (38 HP @ 8000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 1962 Honda S500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 528 kg more than 1962 Honda S500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Honda S500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Honda S500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Honda S500. (39 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Honda S500. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 1962 Honda S500 has manual transmission. 1962 Honda S500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: