2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1964 Volvo 120
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 198 kg more than 1964 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 120. (144 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford e-Ka | 1964 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | e-Ka | 120 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 144 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1010 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2610 mm |