2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1966 Mini Countryman

To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mini Countryman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mini Countryman would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1966 Mini Countryman. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 1966 Mini Countryman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 548 kg more than 1966 Mini Countryman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mini Countryman. (61 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mini Countryman. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 1966 Mini Countryman has manual transmission. 1966 Mini Countryman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: