2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1967 Mazda Luce
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Luce. (70 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Luce. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 158 kg more than 1967 Mazda Luce. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Luce. (118 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Luce.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford e-Ka | 1967 Mazda Luce | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | e-Ka | Luce |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 118 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1050 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2510 mm |