2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1970 Volkswagen Type 3 Squareback
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Volkswagen Type 3 Squareback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Volkswagen Type 3 Squareback would be higher.
Because 1970 Volkswagen Type 3 Squareback is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Volkswagen Type 3 Squareback. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 1970 Volkswagen Type 3 Squareback has manual transmission. 1970 Volkswagen Type 3 Squareback will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford e-Ka | 1970 Volkswagen Type 3 Squareback | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | e-Ka | Type 3 Squareback |
Year Released | 2000 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |