2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1972 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 248 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford e-Ka | 1972 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | e-Ka | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 960 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2480 mm |