2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1972 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1972 Mitsubishi Minica. (33 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 1972 Mitsubishi Minica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 738 kg more than 1972 Mitsubishi Minica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mitsubishi Minica. (39 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mitsubishi Minica.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford e-Ka | 1972 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | e-Ka | Minica |
Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 358 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 39 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 470 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2010 mm |