2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1974 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,563 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Nissan Cedric (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 112 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 Nissan Cedric (216 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (190 Nm). This means 1974 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 1974 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | e-Ka | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 2563 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1320 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
