2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1981 Skoda L
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1981 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 1981 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 383 kg more than 1981 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Skoda L. (74 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 1981 Skoda L | |
| Make | Ford | Skoda |
| Model | e-Ka | L |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1044 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 825 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2410 mm |
