2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 338 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (90 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | e-Ka | Lancer |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1244 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 90 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 870 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2390 mm |
