2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1982 Simca 1100
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Simca 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Simca 1100 would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1982 Simca 1100. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 1982 Simca 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 328 kg more than 1982 Simca 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Simca 1100. (66 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Simca 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 1982 Simca 1100 | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | e-Ka | 1100 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 944 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 66 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 880 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2530 mm |
