2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1985 Mazda 323

To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1985 Mazda 323. (72 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 1985 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 308 kg more than 1985 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mazda 323. (111 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mazda 323. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 1985 Mazda 323 has manual transmission. 1985 Mazda 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: