2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1987 Plymouth Turismo
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Plymouth Turismo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Plymouth Turismo would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Plymouth Turismo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Plymouth Turismo (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Plymouth Turismo should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 138 kg more than 1987 Plymouth Turismo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Plymouth Turismo. (161 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Plymouth Turismo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 1987 Plymouth Turismo | |
| Make | Ford | Plymouth |
| Model | e-Ka | Turismo |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1987 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 2213 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 161 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1070 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2460 mm |
