2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1987 Zastava Yugo
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Zastava Yugo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Zastava Yugo would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1987 Zastava Yugo. (66 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 1987 Zastava Yugo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Zastava Yugo. (98 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Zastava Yugo. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 1987 Zastava Yugo has manual transmission. 1987 Zastava Yugo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 1987 Zastava Yugo | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | e-Ka | Yugo |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1987 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 66 HP |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 98 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2510 mm |
