2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1991 Rover 100
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Rover 100 would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Rover 100 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Rover 100 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 338 kg more than 1991 Rover 100.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Rover 100. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 1991 Rover 100 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | e-Ka | 100 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 870 kg |
