2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,554 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Magna (114 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Magna weights approximately 127 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Magna (198 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (190 Nm). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Magna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford e-Ka | 1992 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | e-Ka | Magna |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 2554 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 198 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1335 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2730 mm |